Re: pg_dump versioning
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_dump versioning |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200510030351.j933prd03166@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | pg_dump versioning ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_dump versioning
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jim C. Nasby wrote: > Watching the discussion about how to handle nextval() and keep it dump > compatible makes me wonder: would it be useful to encode database or > dump version info into dumps? ISTM it would make it much more feasible > to handle changes to how things work automatically. Yes, we have talked about that, and it would work for pg_dump-generated dumps. What it might not work for cleanly are dumps moved a different way, or application changes, so while it might help in some cases, being able to get things working without the version info is desirable. If we ever get to a case where we _need_ to use it, it would be good to have, just in case. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania19073
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: