Re: XA
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: XA |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200509292009.32098.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | XA (Chris Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: XA
|
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Chris, > There was an JDBC-based *attempt* at an XA handler; it wasn't fully > functional, which essentially means it wasn't really XA. > > When the 2PC discussion was going on, it definitely came up in the > discussion that this was a prerequisite to doing XA properly. It > might not be forcibly necessary in the strictest sense, but 2PC is > certainly one of the normal means for synchronizing distributed > transactions... But ... now that we have 2PC, XA could be implemented through pg-jdbc if someone wanted to, yes? -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: