Re: [GENERAL] 8.1 observation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [GENERAL] 8.1 observation
Дата
Msg-id 200509231753.j8NHrEO13075@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [GENERAL] 8.1 observation  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Tony Caduto <tony_caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com> writes:
> > I just noticed that pronargs in pg_proc does not show the full arg 
> > count, seems only to show count of IN args.
> > shouldn't this show the full arg count including in/out/inout?
> 
> There was some discussion of that just a day or so ago; so far no one's
> come up with a reasonable suggestion for what the output should look like.

Is this a TODO?  You don't really pass the OUT parameters as parameters
to the function, so the current behavior seems fine to me.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 2 forks for md5?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] 8.1 observation