Re: logging blemishes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: logging blemishes
Дата
Msg-id 200509221533.j8MFXoh02536@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: logging blemishes  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> > >Are you saying "connection received" should honor %q?  It seems it is a
> > >session line, rather than a server line, no?
> > >
> > >  
> > >
> > 
> > Maybe, the line just struck me as rather ugly. Never mind.
> 
> Now that you mention it, the log line for connections does look wrong. 
> "[local]" doesn't have remote port numbers like tcp does.  The remote
> port is the same number as the server port.  I am thinking we should
> suppress the 'port=' output for local connections.  We properly suppress
> the port number in parentheses for log_line_prefix='%r'.

Done.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Why does VACUUM FULL bother locking pages?
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hierarchical Queries--Stalled No Longer...