Re: PGDN and CVS
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PGDN and CVS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200509211215.11178.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PGDN and CVS ("Gevik babakhani" <gevik@xs4all.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: PGDN and CVS
Re: PGDN and CVS |
Список | pgsql-www |
Gevik, > I'm not discouraged in anyway... I have just been looking over and over > for a CMS that we could use in our project. Time after time I end up > with commercial products. And even if they are opensource, they need to > be so much customized that one has to put more time in customizing the > CMS framework rather than building the actual requirement. What is it you're trying to implement, exactly, that you don't find supported? Is it the tree structure? Even if existing CMSes require customization, I think it'd be better to work with that project and try to get them involved in the feature. As far as I know, the only CMS you've really tried is Drupal. Both Bricolage and Framewerk are intimate with the PostgreSQL community and could be counted on to work with you. I don't think you even looked at Bricolage after Marc set it up. I also don't think you've evaluated "more time to implement" using valid criteria. If you do a custom CMS, you're going to need to impement all of the common stuff yourself: Authentication User management (including "e-mail me my password, etc.") Approval/rights structures Versioning admin Editors (inc. wyswyg and/or bbcode edit) RSS etc. Did your really add up coding all of the above compared to customizing an existing system? Again, I'm not trying to discourage you, but from my perspective half a CMS is worse than none. --Josh -- --Josh Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: