Re: Per-table freeze limit proposal

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim C. Nasby
Тема Re: Per-table freeze limit proposal
Дата
Msg-id 20050919150516.GY7630@pervasive.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Per-table freeze limit proposal  ("Jim Buttafuoco" <jim@contactbda.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
It would also be very handy to be able to tell how many transactions (or
inserts/updates/deletes) have occured since the last vacuum. Presumably
autovacuum needs to know this already, but is it exposed?

On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 07:46:26AM -0400, Jim Buttafuoco wrote:
> while you are at it, can you put in some audit timestamps as to when the vacuum occurred (full vs not full). 
> 
> 
> ---------- Original Message -----------
> From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>
> To: Hackers <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
> Sent: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:14:23 -0400
> Subject: [HACKERS] Per-table freeze limit proposal
> 
> > Hackers,
> > 
> > As you've probably heard too many times already, I'm thinking in
> > improving vacuum, so we can keep track of the freeze Xid on a table
> > level, rather than database level.  Hopefully this will eliminate the
> > need for database-wide vacuums.
-- 
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: DISTINCT vs. GROUP BY
Следующее
От: "Magnus Hagander"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Beta2 Wrap Up ...