Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches

* Greg Stark (gsstark@mit.edu) wrote:
> However I was under the impression that 2.6 had moved beyond that problem.
> It would be very interesting to know if 2.6 still suffers from this.

The tests on the em64t at my place were using 2.6.12.  I had thought 2.6
was better about this too, but I don't have another explanation for it.
CONFIG_SMT was enabled, etc..
Thanks,
    Stephen