Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches
Дата
Msg-id 200509160940.26337.josh@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Spinlocks, yet again: analysis and proposed patches  (Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom,

> What I think this means is that the kernel is scheduling the 2 processes
> onto 2 processors chosen-at-random, without awareness of whether those
> two processors are on the same chip (in the Xeon case) or have closer
> NUMA affinity (in the Opteron case).

That would be consistent with my experience with HT, and the reason why many 
software vendors recommend disabling it.  Not sure about NUMA.

-- 
Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Why does VACUUM FULL bother locking pages?
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Remove xmin and cmin from frozen tuples