* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> > * Ben (bench@silentmedia.com) wrote:
> >> Sweet, indeed it is. DISTINCT ON seems to be a postgresism, but I can
> >> live with that.
>
> > Uhhh, I was pretty sure it was standard SQL...
>
> Nope, definitely a Postgres-ism.
Huh. Guess I suck then. I actually do this a fair bit, is there any
way to do it in standard SQL? It's terribly useful...
Thanks,
Stephen