Re: -fPIC

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Stephen Frost
Тема Re: -fPIC
Дата
Msg-id 20050911205705.GB6026@ns.snowman.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: -fPIC  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
* Peter Eisentraut (peter_e@gmx.net) wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > The reason for -fpic vs -fPIC (on the machines where it makes any
> > difference at all) is that the former is faster.
>
> I don't doubt that, but out of curiosity, considering that everyone else
> is using libtool, and libtool always uses -fPIC, what kind of impact
> does this *really* have?

I certainly wouldn't assume something done in libtool is necessairly the
'smart' approach, ever.

> > I think the correct answer is for PL/Java to do s/-fpic/-fPIC/ on
> > CFLAGS in its Makefile, rather than trying to force the same on
> > everything else.
>
> That would certainly work, but is that the kind of interface we want to
> offer?  In the extreme case, a module could end up redefining a great
> deal of the shared library knowledge that it was supposed to not have
> to care about.

I don't think it's all that sane to expect a generalized build system to
support every possible library compilation requirement...
Thanks,
    Stephen

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Hans-Jürgen Schönig
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: random system table corruption ...
Следующее
От: Michael Fuhr
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: problem for o/p