Re: Why hash join instead of nested loop?

On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 08:58:26PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I'd be interested to see results from other people using 7.4.* too.

I just built 7.4.1 on FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE and ran your test:

test=# explain analyze select rtmessagestate.* from rtmessagestate,connection where (connection_registry_id =  40105)
AND(obj1  = 73582) and id = obj2; 
                                                                     QUERY PLAN
                            

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Hash Join  (cost=4.83..5.91 rows=1 width=14) (actual time=0.220..0.264 rows=1 loops=1)
   Hash Cond: ("outer".id = "inner".obj2)
   ->  Seq Scan on rtmessagestate  (cost=0.00..1.05 rows=5 width=14) (actual time=0.015..0.050 rows=5 loops=1)
   ->  Hash  (cost=4.83..4.83 rows=1 width=4) (actual time=0.103..0.103 rows=0 loops=1)
         ->  Index Scan using connection_regid_obj1_index on connection  (cost=0.00..4.83 rows=1 width=4) (actual
time=0.070..0.081rows=1 loops=1) 
               Index Cond: ((connection_registry_id = 40105) AND (obj1 = 73582))
 Total runtime: 0.495 ms
(7 rows)

--
Michael Fuhr