Re: [HACKERS] Enticing interns to PostgreSQL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Peter Eisentraut
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Enticing interns to PostgreSQL
Дата
Msg-id 200507272005.23533.peter_e@gmx.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Enticing interns to PostgreSQL  (Jeff Davis <jdavis-pgsql@empires.org>)
Список pgsql-advocacy
Jeff Davis wrote:
> I mostly agree, but I don't think we can dismiss enum completely.
> After all, boolean is pretty much enum(false,true), and nobody would
> advocate removing that type.

I think you can make the mathematical argument that enums are valid and
useful.  I'm not going to do that here, but some thoughts:  As you
point out, any scalar type is really just a set of conveniently chosen
symbols that are made interesting by functions and operators.  In
traditional programming languages as well as in the MySQL case, "enums"
are just a short-hand way to define such a scalar type without any
interesting operators.

Single column tables that merely serve to prove the existence of a
concept are valid if those concepts are part of your data model (who
are my customers?) but not if they are part of the intrinsics that you
base your data model on (these are the colors existing in the physical
world).  The question is where you draw the line.  PostgreSQL gives you
a default line.  In don't think you can operate completely without any
line.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Josh Berkus
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ENUM type
Следующее
От: Chris Travers
Дата:
Сообщение: MySQL to PostgreSQL, was ENUM type