Re: ENUM type
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ENUM type |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200507270940.27510.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ENUM type (Chris Travers <chris@travelamericas.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: ENUM type
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
Chris, > The varchar primary key idea (which I think is probably the best > solution) is certainly normalized, but it is also certainly inefficient > disk-wise. Only if you're real short on RAM. Tiny lookup tables tend to get cached in the shared buffer cache and stay there. Your only real overhead is if the application has dozens of ENUMs in a query, causing the number of joins to exceed the number the plannner can plan well. Otherwise, you're preaching false optimization. Overall, I'd say that this is really a waste of time compared to the kind of things you *could* be doing to make converting from MySQL easier, like updating and maintaining the database conversion scripts, writing substitutes for last_insert_id and replace into, or (best of all) writing a detailed "PostgreSQL for MySQL Users" guide. I personally have converted 3 production applications from MySQL to PostgreSQL, and encountered two total ENUM columns in the process. -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: