Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
Дата
Msg-id 200507261531.18937.josh@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Simon,

> We should run tests with much higher wal_buffers numbers to nullify the
> effect described above and reduce contention. That way we will move
> towards the log disk speed being the limiting factor, patch or no patch.

I've run such tests, at a glance they do seem to improve performance.   I 
need some time to collate the results.

-- 
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Jochem van Dieten
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: ENUM type
Следующее
От: "Kevin McArthur"
Дата:
Сообщение: RESULT_OID Bug