Re: Are long term never commited SELECT statements are a problem?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Fuhr
Тема Re: Are long term never commited SELECT statements are a problem?
Дата
Msg-id 20050721151811.GA513@winnie.fuhr.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Are long term never commited SELECT statements are a problem?  (Erik Wasser <erik.wasser@iquer.net>)
Ответы Re: Are long term never commited SELECT statements are a problem?  (Erik Wasser <erik.wasser@iquer.net>)
Список pgsql-sql
On Thu, Jul 21, 2005 at 03:57:56PM +0200, Erik Wasser wrote:
> Now I've got here a blocking problem. Severel SQL statements (like 
> renaming a field or UPDATE of a field) are blocked until I kill a 
> certain task. This task DOES only the INSERTS and UPDATES with a 
> transaction and the SELECT statements are not within an transaction. 

If you set AutoCommit to 0 then all statements are inside a
transaction.  As you've discovered, SELECT acquires certain locks
that persist for the duration of the transaction, so you must commit
or roll back the transaction to release those locks (read up on
transaction theory to learn more about the rationale for this).

-- 
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/


В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Can SELECT statements throw an error
Следующее
От: Erik Wasser
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Are long term never commited SELECT statements are a problem?