Re: To Postgres or not
| От | Roman Neuhauser |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: To Postgres or not |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20050714061435.GA71499@isis.sigpipe.cz обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: To Postgres or not (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
# alvherre@alvh.no-ip.org / 2005-07-14 00:57:57 -0400:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 02:46:01PM +1000, Neil Conway wrote:
> > Vivek Khera wrote:
> > >The first sentence rules out MySQL, so the second sentence should read
> > >"So that leaves Postgres". Your problem is solved ;-)
> > >
> > >(If you are accustomed to Oracle, you are probably expecting an ACID
> > >database, which rules out MySQL too).
> >
> > Does MySQL with InnoDB not qualify as an ACID-compliant database?
>
> Not if you intermix InnoDB tables with MyISAM tables, which AFAIK many
> people seem to do.
MyISAM tables are/were useful for poor man's sequences exactly
because rollback doesn't affect them.
--
How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You don't know, man. You don't KNOW.
Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: