Re: Must be owner to truncate?
| От | Stephen Frost |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Must be owner to truncate? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20050708130741.GP24207@ns.snowman.net обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Must be owner to truncate? (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Must be owner to truncate?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Christopher Kings-Lynne (chriskl@familyhealth.com.au) wrote:
> >There are other reasons for restricting it:
> > * truncate takes a much stronger lock than a plain delete does.
> > * truncate is not MVCC-safe.
> >
> >I don't really agree with the viewpoint that truncate is just a quick
> >DELETE, and so I do not agree that DELETE permissions should be enough
> >to let you do a TRUNCATE.
>
> Ah. I didn't realise that 2nd point. I don't care so much about the
> stronger lock in my application.
Does truncate not being MVCC-safe cause problems in your situation? It
certainly doesn't in mine and I expect the same is true for alot of
others in the same situation.
Thanks,
Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: