On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2 Jul 2005, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>
>>> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>>>
>>>> Does the FreeBSD one actually produce different output?
>>>
>>>
>>> If it did not, why would they bother making a separate package called
>>> "gnu-autoconf" with the note "This port is specifically designed for
>>> developers that want to create cross-platform software distributions on
>>> FreeBSD."?
>>
>>
>> If it did produce different output, why haven't we noticed it prior to
>> this? Has there actually *been* a problem that nobody has reported?
>>
>>
> Is autoconf actually run as part of any of our packaging scripts? My
> impression was that developers ran it and the committed the results (e.g. a
> configure script), unlike, say, bison where the scripts for tarballs have to
> call it. But then, of course I hardly know :-)
Every time I do a release, the last step is to update teh version numbver
in configure.in and run autoconf on it, and I do that using the version of
autoconf that is on the development server itself (ie. the FreeBSD one)
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664