Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC
Дата
Msg-id 200506291137.15705.josh@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Checkpoint cost, looks like it is WAL/CRC  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom, All:

Ok, finally managed though the peristent efforts of Mark Wong to get some 
tests through.  Here are two tests with the CRC and wall buffer checking 
completely cut out of the code, as Tom suggested:

5-min checkpoint:
http://khack.osdl.org/stp/302738/results/0/
http://khack.osdl.org/stp/302706/results/0/
60-min checkpoint:
http://khack.osdl.org/stp/302739/results/0/
(please note that OSDL is having technical difficulties and some links may 
not work)

This is the performance profile I'd expect and want to see, and the 
frequency for checkpoints doesn't affect the overall performance at all.  
Contrast it with these:

5-min checkpoint:
http://khack.osdl.org/stp/302671/results/0/
I don't hae a 60-minute checkpoint for comparison because of failures on 
the STP :-(

So, now that we know what the performance bottleneck is, how do we fix it?

-- 
--Josh

Josh Berkus
Aglio Database Solutions
San Francisco


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal: associative arrays for plpgsql (concept)
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles