Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Steve Atkins
Тема Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity
Дата
Msg-id 20050622162317.GA17911@gp.word-to-the-wise.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity  (Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com>)
Ответы Re: pl/pgsql: END verbosity  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@surnet.cl>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 23, 2005 at 01:41:49AM +1000, Neil Conway wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> >But this doesn't make it easier to use - users don't just include those who
> >write it. The antecedent language of these, Ada, from which this syntax
> >comes, was explicitly designed to be reader-friendly as opposed to
> >writer-friendly, and this is a part of that.
> 
> IMHO it is just needless verbiage that makes programs both harder to 
> read *and* harder to write, albeit marginally so. I think there is a 
> reason why Ada-style block terminators are in the minority among 
> block-structured languages :)
> 
> But obviously this is a matter of taste -- does anyone else like or 
> dislike the current syntax?

"Like" is a bit strong. But it does make functions written in it easier
to read. And given that the primary debugging methodolofy for pl/pgsql
is "Look at it hard and see what might be incorrect" I can't see that
as a bad thing.

I'd trade a whole lot of "harder to write" for even some "likely to
work".

Cheers, Steve


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: User Quota Implementation
Следующее
От: "Jim C. Nasby"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Problem with dblink regression test