Re: LGPL

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: LGPL
Дата
Msg-id 200506171921.j5HJLil13826@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: LGPL  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Dave Cramer wrote:
> > Huh ?
> > 
> > ./configure --without-readliine
> > 
> > works just fine, there is no requirement.
> 
> Again:
> 
> If we **link** to readline, postgresql won't start without it.
> That is a postgresql requirement. Yes we can compile without
> it. That isn't what I was talking about.
> 
> But as Andrew pointed out, it doesn't really matter.

The point is the the source does not require it, but specific binaries
might based on how they are built.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: LGPL
Следующее
От: "Dave Page"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Utility database (Was: RE: Autovacuum in the backend)