Am Donnerstag, 2. Juni 2005 12:03 schrieb Martijn van Oosterhout:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 12:58:33PM +0300, Kaloyan Iliev Iliev wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I suppose the paralel work will be a problem if you are using one
> > sequence for all tables.
>
> I don't know about this. Sequences are designed to be very efficient,
> they don't rollback and can be cached by backends.
>
> In several of the databases I setup, I sometimes arranged for sequences
> to start at different points so when you setup a foreign key there was
> no chance you linked it to the wrong table. This especially in cases
> where there might be confusion about which table links where.
>
> Using one serial for everything does this even better. As for
> performance, I think disk I/O is going to be an issue before getting
> sequence numbers will be...
I guess i will use one sequence for all tables if there are now drawbacks.
BTW: OIDs are using the same conecpt, don't they? And for me it makes sense
to use a sequence only for getting a unique identifier and nothing else. even
better if this identifier is unique among all tables.
Thanks a lot for your opinions!
regards
janning