Andrew - Supernews wrote:
> On 2005-05-01, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> > The problem, as I understand it, is that if you have a long-running
> > query and the client process disappears, the query keeps running and
> > holds whatever resources it may have until it finishes. In fact, it
> > keeps sending data to the client and keeps ignoring the SIGPIPE it gets
> > (in case of a Unix-domain socket connection).
>
> Ignoring the SIGPIPE is exactly the right thing to do.
>
> What's _not_ a good idea is ignoring the EPIPE error from write(), which
> seems to currently be reported via ereport(COMMERROR) which doesn't try
> and abort the query as far as I can tell.
Where are you seeing this? I looked from PostgresMain() to
ReadCommand() to SocketBackend() to pq_getbyte() which returns EOF, and
PostgresMain checks that and does a proc_exit(0).
I think the main problem is that a long-running query never tries to
interact with the client during the query.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073