Re: pgFoundry

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Lamar Owen
Тема Re: pgFoundry
Дата
Msg-id 200505161445.40906.lowen@pari.edu
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pgFoundry  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Monday 16 May 2005 14:07, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> > This could in a sense be as simple as
> > prioritising the TODO list.

> But the TODO list could certainly be made more informative without
> getting into that swamp. 

We need to prune the TODO list to make it more useful.  This will be hard, 
this is true, but if a pruning discussion for each item on the list is held 
then the real interest in the item would stick out like a sore thumb.  It's 
just too big and not really hierarchical.

Are we too close to freeze and beta on 8.1 to have this sort of discussion?  
It doesn't need to be discussed close to a beta cycle, IMO, or it could 
easily turn into the huge distraction Tom speaks of.
-- 
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC  28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgFoundry
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Returning the name of a primary key