Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company
Дата
Msg-id 200505021957.j42Jvaj08345@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-advocacy
Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> writes:
> > As you've already observed, if Tom doesn't like something it's very unlikely
> > to get through.
>
> I lose my share of arguments --- in fact, in the twenty minutes since
> your posting I already notice Bruce committing a patch I had objected to
> ;-).

I replied to your concerns on Saturday night, and when I saw no
community response by noon today, I assume everyone as OK and applied
it.  I suppose this is as good an illustration of the process as we are
going to get.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Treat
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement
Следующее
От: "Lance Obermeyer"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Pervasive Postgres + SuSE