Re: BUG #1630: Wrong conversion in to_date() function. See example.

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ariel Carna
Тема Re: BUG #1630: Wrong conversion in to_date() function. See example.
Дата
Msg-id 20050427150126.B2BAE18F42@fox.tarifar.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #1630: Wrong conversion in to_date() function. See example.  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-bugs
With Oracle (at least since 6.x version) this conversion is wrong.


Atentamente ,=20

Ariel Carn=E1




-----Mensaje original-----
De: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]=20
Enviado el: Mi=E9rcoles, 27 de Abril de 2005 11:54 a.m.
Para: Michael Fuhr
CC: Ariel E. Carn=C3=A1/Elizabeth Sosa; pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
Asunto: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1630: Wrong conversion in to_date() function. See
example.=20

Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> writes:
> If anything I'd expect 2005-02-32 to be rejected as invalid, but I
> don't know the history or rationale behind to_date's behavior.

It is rejected by the standard date input converter:

regression=3D# select '2005-02-32'::date;
ERROR:  date/time field value out of range: "2005-02-32"
HINT:  Perhaps you need a different "datestyle" setting.

However we consider that to_date() exists to be Oracle compatible,
and so I would regard this as a bug if and only if Oracle does
something different with the same input.  Anyone know?

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Sokolov Yura
Дата:
Сообщение: BUG 1614 and BUG 1616 : Inadequate GIST Behaviour
Следующее
От: "Don Courtney"
Дата:
Сообщение: BUG #1634: Configure step for build does not define HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS