Re: Delete query takes exorbitant amount of time

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruno Wolff III
Тема Re: Delete query takes exorbitant amount of time
Дата
Msg-id 20050403121820.GB27923@wolff.to
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Delete query takes exorbitant amount of time  (Karim A Nassar <Karim.Nassar@NAU.EDU>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 01:48:48 -0700,
  Karim A Nassar <Karim.Nassar@NAU.EDU> wrote:
>
> For this FK check, there only need be one referring id to invalidate the
> delete. ISTM that for any delete with a FK reference, the index could
> always be used to search for a single value in the referring table
> (excepting very small tables). Why then must a sequential scan be
> performed in this case, and/or in general?

First the index needs to exist. It isn't created automatically because not
everyone wants such an index. Second, you need to have analyzed the
referencing table so that the planner will know it is big enough that
using an indexed search is worthwhile. The planner is getting better
about dealing with size changes without reanalyzing, but it seems there
are still some gotchas in 8.0.

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: PFC
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Query Optimizer Failure / Possible Bug
Следующее
От: Bruno Wolff III
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: coalesce alternative