Re: plpython function problem workaround

On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 11:34:46AM +0100, Marco Colombo wrote:

> Just let me suggest not to mimic its behaviour, but to use the
> Real Thing if we manage to. That is, directly use the Universal Line
> Support code provided by python itself, so that we don't even have
> to think about being compatible.

Sounds good if the Python API provides the hooks for doing so.  I
had started looking into that but didn't spent much time on it.

> I'm experimenting a bit, trying to write a PLy_procedure_compile()
> that does not require source munging. I'm aiming at removing the
> need for extra indentation.

Sounds good too, if that'll work.  Looking forward to seeing what
you find out.

--
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/