Merlin Moncure wrote:
>
> > than something we would have in our docs. Perhaps we should like to
> > more outside documentation, but the URL you provided is so
> content-light
> > that I would not recommend it.
>
> hm, I'm not so sure I would agree with that sentiment. Good information
> on how to deal with database concurrency issues seems to me to be pretty
> hard to find. Let me ask you this, do you think the current
> documentation on database concurrency could be improved, and if so, how?
> Right now, it is fairly abstract and technical, and that may be a good
> thing.
Yea, I guess we could improve it, but looking at cost/benefit, I am not
sure how much sense it makes to add stuff that is not
PostgreSQL-specific.
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073