Re: Bumping libpq version number?
| От | Kurt Roeckx |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Bumping libpq version number? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20050311192804.GA26406@roeckx.be обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Bumping libpq version number? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 11, 2005 at 01:29:46PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > > Does initdb call pg_snprintf directly? Or does it call some > > libpq function that calls it? > > With the current CVS, initdb calls pg_snprintf() on my platform which > doesn't support %$ natively on my libc printf. Now, initdb could pull > from pgport itself but I think it pulled from libpq first. Perhaps we > should reorder how those libraries appear in the link line but I think > that would fix just this case, not the more general one of pg client > apps. Do "client apps" ever link to pgport itself? I assume only "internal" applictions link to it? I assume libpq is staticly linked to pgport and is exporting symbols it shouldn't. Can we prevent it from exporting those symbols? Kurt
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: