Re: index scan on =, but not < ?

On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 10:38:21PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> Not exactly. If the number of rows to be examined is on the order of 5%
> of the table, an index scan will probably be slower than a sequential
> scan. The visibility issue makes index scans slower in the case that

Shouldn't that be 50%?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"