Re: multi billion row tables: possible or insane?
| От | Jim C. Nasby |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: multi billion row tables: possible or insane? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20050304220507.GH2209@decibel.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | multi billion row tables: possible or insane? (Ramon Bastiaans <bastiaans@sara.nl>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Tue, Mar 01, 2005 at 10:34:29AM +0100, Ramon Bastiaans wrote: > Hi all, > > I am doing research for a project of mine where I need to store several > billion values for a monitoring and historical tracking system for a big > computer system. My currect estimate is that I have to store (somehow) > around 1 billion values each month (possibly more). On a side-note, do you need to keep the actual row-level details for history? http://rrs.decibel.org might be of some use. Other than that, what others have said. Lots and lots of disks in RAID10, and opterons (though I would choose opterons not for memory size but because of memory *bandwidth*). -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel@decibel.org Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: