Re: UTF8 or Unicode
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: UTF8 or Unicode |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200502251732.22414.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: UTF8 or Unicode (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: UTF8 or Unicode
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Am Freitag, 25. Februar 2005 16:26 schrieb Bruce Momjian: > OK, but what about latin1? The following character set names are specified in the SQL standard and therefore somewhat non-negotiable: SQL_CHARACTER GRAPHIC_IRV LATIN1 ISO8BIT UTF16 UTF8 UCS2 SQL_TEXT SQL_IDENTIFIER So we have to use LATIN1, even though it creates an inconsistency. We discussed this a while ago during the last great renaming, I think. Btw., I think ISO8BIT is the correct name for what we call SQL_ASCII, but I haven't analyzed that in detail, yet. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: