Re: IBM patent

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Marc G. Fournier
Тема Re: IBM patent
Дата
Msg-id 20050129183128.K63001@ganymede.hub.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: IBM patent  (Christopher Browne <cbbrowne@acm.org>)
Ответы Re: IBM patent  (Kevin Brown <kevin@sysexperts.com>)
Re: IBM patent  (Tommi Maekitalo <t.maekitalo@epgmbh.de>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005, Christopher Browne wrote:

> Actually, the latter isn't so.
>
> If Mammoth or Pervasive or such release their own release of
> PostgreSQL, nothing has historically mandated that they make that
> release available under the BSD license.
>
> Presumably acceptance of the patent would change that.
>
> You and I might not have individual objections to this situation, but
> one or another of the companies putting together PostgreSQL releases
> very well might.

But, there is nothing stop'ng them from replacing the ARC code with their 
own variant though ...

----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Christopher Browne
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: IBM patent
Следующее
От: Neil Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Implementing Bitmap Indexes