Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL
| От | Josh Berkus |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200501250858.37157.josh@agliodbs.com обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL ("Peter Darley" <pdarley@kinesis-cem.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PgPool changes WAS: PostgreSQL clustering VS MySQL
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Peter, Ragnar, > > Are there ones that you use which might use several different connections > > to send a series of queries from a single web-user, less than 5 seconds > > apart? > > Using Apache/Perl I often have a situation where we're sending several > queries from the same user (web client) within seconds, or even > simultaneously, that use different connections. So from the sound of it, the connection methods I've been using are the exception rather than the rule. Darn, it worked well for us. :-( What this would point to is NOT being able to use Slony-I for database server pooling for most web applications. Yes? Users should look to pgCluster and C-JDBC instead. BTW, Tatsuo, what's the code relationship between pgPool and pgCluster, if any? --Josh -- Josh Berkus Aglio Database Solutions San Francisco
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: