Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1
| От | Alvaro Herrera |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20050123151337.GD4406@dcc.uchile.cl обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1 (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Two-phase commit for 8.1
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 01:37:30PM +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > As the patch gets more attention, I'm sure more issues will come up. I see the changes to the lock manager are huge. Can you explain what's the idea behind those? Do you release the locks and then reacquire them, or do you reassign them to a pseudo process? Are there possibilities of deadlock somewhere? -- Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[@]dcc.uchile.cl>) Thou shalt study thy libraries and strive not to reinvent them without cause, that thy code may be short and readable and thy days pleasant and productive. (7th Commandment for C Programmers)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: