Odd number of rows expected

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jim C. Nasby
Тема Odd number of rows expected
Дата
Msg-id 20050121203827.GW67721@decibel.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Odd number of rows expected  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-performance
I have a query that thinks it's going to generate a huge number of rows,
when in fact it won't:

INSERT INTO page_log.rrs
        ( bucket_id, page_id,project_id,other, hits,min_hits,max_hits,total_duration,min_duration,max_duration )
    SELECT a.rrs_bucket_id, page_id,project_id,other
                , count(*),count(*),count(*),sum(duration),min(duration),max(duration)
        FROM
            (SELECT b.bucket_id AS rrs_bucket_id, s.*
                FROM rrs.bucket b
                    JOIN page_log.log s
                        ON (
                            b.prev_end_time  < log_time
                            AND b.end_time >= log_time )
                WHERE b.rrs_id = '1'
                    AND b.end_time <= '2005-01-21 20:23:00+00'
                    AND b.end_time > '1970-01-01 00:00:00+00'
            ) a
        GROUP BY rrs_bucket_id, page_id,project_id,other;

                                                                                        QUERY PLAN
                                                                   

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Subquery Scan "*SELECT*"  (cost=170461360504.98..183419912556.69 rows=91175544 width=77)
   ->  GroupAggregate  (cost=170461360504.98..183418316984.67 rows=91175544 width=29)
         ->  Sort  (cost=170461360504.98..171639141309.21 rows=471112321692 width=29)
               Sort Key: b.bucket_id, s.page_id, s.project_id, s.other
               ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..17287707964.10 rows=471112321692 width=29)
                     ->  Seq Scan on bucket b  (cost=0.00..9275.84 rows=281406 width=20)
                           Filter: ((rrs_id = 1) AND (end_time <= '2005-01-21 20:23:00+00'::timestamp with time zone)
AND(end_time > '1970-01-01 00:00:00+00'::timestamp with time zone)) 
                     ->  Index Scan using log__log_time on log s  (cost=0.00..36321.24 rows=1674137 width=33)
                           Index Cond: (("outer".prev_end_time < s.log_time) AND ("outer".end_time >= s.log_time))

The final rowcount after the aggregate will actually be about 1.9M
rows:
                                                                                        QUERY PLAN
                                                                   

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Subquery Scan "*SELECT*"  (cost=170461360504.98..183419912556.69 rows=91175544 width=77) (actual
time=156777.374..234613.843rows=1945123 loops=1) 
   ->  GroupAggregate  (cost=170461360504.98..183418316984.67 rows=91175544 width=29) (actual
time=156777.345..214246.751rows=1945123 loops=1) 
         ->  Sort  (cost=170461360504.98..171639141309.21 rows=471112321692 width=29) (actual
time=156777.296..177517.663rows=4915567 loops=1) 
               Sort Key: b.bucket_id, s.page_id, s.project_id, s.other
               ->  Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..17287707964.10 rows=471112321692 width=29) (actual time=0.662..90702.755
rows=4915567loops=1) 
                     ->  Seq Scan on bucket b  (cost=0.00..9275.84 rows=281406 width=20) (actual time=0.063..1591.591
rows=265122loops=1) 
                           Filter: ((rrs_id = 1) AND (end_time <= '2005-01-21 20:23:00+00'::timestamp with time zone)
AND(end_time > '1970-01-01 00:00:00+00'::timestamp with time zone)) 
                     ->  Index Scan using log__log_time on log s  (cost=0.00..36321.24 rows=1674137 width=33) (actual
time=0.014..0.174rows=19 loops=265122) 
                           Index Cond: (("outer".prev_end_time < s.log_time) AND ("outer".end_time >= s.log_time))
 Total runtime: 299623.954 ms

Everything is analyzed, and the statistics target is set to 1000.
Basically, it seems that it doesn't understand that each row in log will
match up with at most one row in bucket. There is a unique index on
bucket(rrs_id, end_time), so it should be able to tell this.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant               decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828

Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?"

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Marty Scholes
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
Следующее
От: Kevin Brown
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft