On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 02:08:20PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > Maybe we should have a pgfoundry project where all translations
> > > were kept, and from which the main CVS could be updated
> > > semi-automatically. Then we wouldn't have Peter checking out and
> > > committing all the time.
> >
> > That sounds like a fine idea. My only concern would be the
> > "not-maintained-here" syndrome, which occurs every time some CVS tree
> > contains a file that is actually maintained by an external group,
> > thus blocking the maintainers of the former CVS tree from applying
> > necessary fixes at times. Nevertheless, I think this is a winner.
> > Let's consider it when we start the 8.1 cycle.
>
> OK, is anyone opposed to this idea? I would register a pgfoundry
> project (name suggestions? "translations"?), give most established
> translators commit access, and move the statistics pages there.
Sounds good. Maybe the name is too generic; what about
"server translations", or something like that?
--
Alvaro Herrera (<alvherre[@]dcc.uchile.cl>)
"¿Cómo puedes confiar en algo que pagas y que no ves,
y no confiar en algo que te dan y te lo muestran?" (Germán Poo)