Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> There were several on 100% until some more messages were marked for
> translation. Doing that days before release was not a good idea IMO.
Yeah, I though so too, but if you think about it, it doesn't harm anyone
except your statistics. :)
> Maybe we should have a pgfoundry project where all translations were
> kept, and from which the main CVS could be updated
> semi-automatically. Then we wouldn't have Peter checking out and
> committing all the time.
That sounds like a fine idea. My only concern would be the
"not-maintained-here" syndrome, which occurs every time some CVS tree
contains a file that is actually maintained by an external group, thus
blocking the maintainers of the former CVS tree from applying necessary
fixes at times. Nevertheless, I think this is a winner. Let's
consider it when we start the 8.1 cycle.
--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/