Re: Weird behavior in transaction handling (Possible bug ?)

On Friday 14 January 2005 16:38, Oliver Jowett wrote:
> It might be worthwhile having commit() throw an exception if the 
> transaction did not actually commit, rather than only reporting 
> server-generated errors. What do people think?

Sounds like a good idea.

> It'd be possible to have optional "automatic savepoint wrapping" in the 
> driver, where every user query was transparently wrapped in 
> subtransaction. You might prefer to write the code to make the driver do 
> this, rather than change your application.

Also seems like a useful feature at first blush.