Re: Slow PL/pgSQL 8.0.RC5 (7.4.6. 3times faster)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Fuhr
Тема Re: Slow PL/pgSQL 8.0.RC5 (7.4.6. 3times faster)
Дата
Msg-id 20050113224233.GA61555@winnie.fuhr.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Slow PL/pgSQL 8.0.RC5 (7.4.6. 3times faster)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Slow PL/pgSQL 8.0.RC5 (7.4.6. 3times faster)  (Pavel Stehule <stehule@kix.fsv.cvut.cz>)
Re: Slow PL/pgSQL 8.0.RC5 (7.4.6. 3times faster)  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Slow PL/pgSQL 8.0.RC5 (7.4.6. 3times faster)  (Mark Kirkwood <markir@coretech.co.nz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 05:05:00PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Pavel Stehule <stehule@kix.fsv.cvut.cz> writes:
> >> And?
> >> 
> >> (ie, what test case are you talking about?)
> 
> > This test is function for searching max factor. It is speaking only about 
> > quality of interpret an language. I would ask why?
> 
> So I can replicate your test.

SELECT delitel(1000000, 1);

Mean times over the last five of six runs on my poor 500MHz FreeBSD
4.11-PRERELEASE box:

6741 ms   7.4.6 (from FreeBSD ports collection)
14427 ms  8.0.0rc5 (from CVS source)

I remembered that I had build 8.0.0rc5 with --enable-debug so I
rebuilt it without that option, not sure if that would make a
difference.  The mean time increased by 8% to 15580 ms, which was
opposite from what I expected.  I re-ran the 7.4.6 tests and they
came out the same as they had before.

I'm not sure what optimization flags (if any) the ports build of
7.4.6 might have used.  I can take a closer look if you think it
matters.

-- 
Michael Fuhr
http://www.fuhr.org/~mfuhr/


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Palle Girgensohn
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug? 8.0 does not use partial index
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: sparse (static analyzer) report