Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
| От | Frank Wiles |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20050110114200.76e9a51d.frank@wiles.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft (Yann Michel <yann-postgresql@spline.de>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL vs. Oracle vs. Microsoft
|
| Список | pgsql-performance |
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 18:33:07 +0100 Yann Michel <yann-postgresql@spline.de> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 11:07:55AM -0500, Alex Turner wrote: > > Neither Oracle nor MS-SQL have the range of stored procedure > > langauges that Postgresql supports. > > That is not true. Oracle uses PL/SQL for its stored procedures and > M$-SQL does have a stored procedural language. By "range" I believe he meant number of stored procedure languages. He wasn't saying they didn't have a stored procedure langauge or support, just that PostgreSQL had more languages to choose from. --------------------------------- Frank Wiles <frank@wiles.org> http://www.wiles.org ---------------------------------
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: