Re: "current" interactive docs busted

On January 5, 2005 04:36 am, Justin Clift wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
> <snip>
>
> > For the record, including dev docs should be easy enough, but I would be
> > inclined to only have a static version. The 'current' version would have
> > to be hard coded of course...
>
>  From a "just had an idea" point of view, if the dev docs allowed
> comments, it might make for an interesting way of getting people to
> review and contribute to them prior to each official release.
>

I like the idea

Robert B