Re: Standard compliant DEFAULT clause
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Standard compliant DEFAULT clause |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2005.1179519725@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Standard compliant DEFAULT clause (Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb@cybertec.at>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Standard compliant DEFAULT clause
|
| Список | pgsql-patches |
Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb@cybertec.at> writes:
> Or not, it's just a bitter and late (because of my bitterness) response
> to the rejection of my IDENTITY/GENERATED patches.
> Where's the much praised standard behaviour on standard syntax?
> So much for hypocrisy.
Hm? There's a difference between extensions and failing to comply with
what the spec says is the behavior of the syntax it provides.
I feel bad that you put so much work into what now seems to be a dead
end (at least until we can get some clarification about what the
committee really intends). But look at the bright side: you learned
quite a bit about the innards of Postgres. Hopefully your next project
will be more successful.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: