Re: pg_class changes for group ownership
| От | Stephen Frost |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: pg_class changes for group ownership |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20041229184156.GD10437@ns.snowman.net обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: pg_class changes for group ownership (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: pg_class changes for group ownership
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> > Ah, alright, sounds good to me. I'll look into making them share a
> > common unique identifier space, that shouldn't be too difficult. Of
> > course, that'll require a dump/restore, I expect.. I don't suppose that
> > could possibly happen before 8.0, eh? :)
>
> Changing pg_class would have the same problem ...
Well, yes, but that's no longer the issue. I guess my thought was that
if we could get the common id space change in before 8.0 then group
ownership could possibly be introduced in 8.1 w/o having to do a
dump/restore. I'm still relatively new to Postgres, is it normal to
require a dump/restore between semi-major (8.0 to 8.1) revisions? If so
then it doesn't matter since I wouldn't expect group ownership to be
introduced prior to 8.1 (at the earliest..) anyway.
Thanks,
Stephen
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: