Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От bhk@dsl.co.uk (Brian {Hamilton Kelly})
Тема Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*)
Дата
Msg-id 20041206.0124.58723snz@dsl.co.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*)  (Woodchuck Bill <bwr607@hotmail.com>)
Список pgsql-general
On Saturday, in article
     <tto3r01vijeu2n9ggr6r5pl3p36bcmn1nf@4ax.com>
     robert.mcclenon@verizon.net "Robert McClenon" wrote:

> I think that the term that is occasionally used is that the hierarchy
> has a hierarchy czar.  That is the most straightforward way to manage
> a hierarchy.  I did not say that it was the best or the worst, only
> the most straightforward.  It doesn't address the question of what
> happens if the czar disappears, for instance.

Seventy-five years' rule by Soviet?

--
Brian {Hamilton Kelly}                                     bhk@dsl.co.uk
   "I don't use Linux. I prefer to use an OS supported by a large multi-
   national vendor, with a good office suite, excellent network/internet
   software and decent hardware support."

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joeseph P. Blow"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: 3rd RFD: comp.databases.postgresql (was: comp.databases.postgresql.*)
Следующее
От: Paul Tillotson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Performance tuning on RedHat Enterprise Linux 3