FYI, this discussion about adding a separate array section to the docs
(which we already have, as Peter pointed out) is independent of the
ARRAY() documentation addition I just put in the patch queue.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
David Fetter wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 01:59:13PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 31, 2004 at 04:36:14PM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> > > Folks,
> > >
> > > Here's a little addition to the array functions & operators
> > > section of the manual. It adds a function array() to the list.
> > >
> > > Cheers, D
> >
> > BTW, it seems it would be useful to dedicate a chapter to array
> > handling, since it's something that's not very common amongst
> > databases.
>
> I guess it depends what you mean. Oracle has "subtables," and other
> things have stuff like that. Also, it's in the SQL standard...
>
> Anyhow, where do you think it should go?
>
> Cheers,
> D
> --
> David Fetter david@fetter.org http://fetter.org/
> phone: +1 510 893 6100 mobile: +1 415 235 3778
>
> Remember to vote!
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
> joining column's datatypes do not match
>
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073