On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 04:31:11PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Seems to me that your real problem is a bogus database layout. If there
> should only be one "common" value for a parent and children, then only
> store one value ... that is, "common" should exist only in the parent.
Tom's answers always make me realise that I should think harder
before I talk. He's right, of course: one common value means store
it once.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
I remember when computers were frustrating because they *did* exactly what
you told them to. That actually seems sort of quaint now. --J.D. Baldwin