Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew McMillan <andrew@catalyst.net.nz> writes:
> > The current functionality could be useful inside particular code paths
> > of an application, where you want to increase the log verbosity in a
> > particular part of the code, when it (unpredictably) happens, without
> > nuking the logs entirely.
> > Of course you are superuser when you review such logs, but I wouldn't
> > usually want the db connection from the application to have to run as
> > superuser if I could help it... especially not a web application.
>
> Sure. There is a workaround for that though, which is to provide a
> SECURITY DEFINER function for the app to call that will adjust the
> logging level for it, rather than trying to do the SET directly in
> unprivileged code.
But if they go that way can it done securely, turned on and off?
--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073