Re: PostgreSQL in the press again
| От | Andrew Sullivan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20041109202310.GG17541@phlogiston.dyndns.org обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL in the press again (Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 09:13:00PM +0100, Thomas Hallgren wrote:
>
> Master + read-only slaves:
> - Slony-I when all sites are trusted
> - dbMirror for untrusted slaves and/or table based master slave assignment
You can do the table-based trick with Slony, too. In fact, AFAIK,
you can do it with every async system.
> - erServer ???
I don't know if anyone is stepping up to take over the BSD version,
but as far as I'm concerned, it's a dead letter. I know there is
some development going on with it at PgSQL, Inc, though.
> - C-JDBC, Will be transaction safe once PostgreSQL has XA
> - pgPool, not transaction safe ???
I think the latter would be, too, if Pg had XA.
A
--
Andrew Sullivan | ajs@crankycanuck.ca
The fact that technology doesn't work is no bar to success in the marketplace.
--Philip Greenspun
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: